The consultation proposes a more rules-based planning process based on the classification of land into one of three categories: 'growth' areas suitable for substantial development; 'renewal' areas suitable for some well-designed development; and 'protected' areas, including the green belt, where development is restricted. Local planning authorities (LPAs) would be expected to identify land in each of these categories in their local plans.
Local plans would be simplified and standardised, replacing general policies for development with a core set of standards and requirements. The government anticipates that this will cut the length of local plans by about two thirds. A shorter statutory timetable of 30 months, or 42 months for LPAs which have adopted a local plan in the past three years, would be introduced within which the new local plans must be put in place.
The government is proposing a shift away from reliance on documents throughout the planning process to a 'digital-first' approach, particularly for those parts of the process that involve community engagement. LPAs will be encouraged to develop digital tools to support community engagement with both the local plan process and decision-making, with communities encouraged to feed their views into the system through social networks and via their phones.
The consultation emphasises "beautiful" development and a focus on design, sustainability and energy efficiency. A new fast-track planning process would be introduced to support "those who want to build beautifully", with automatic permission for "high quality" developments which "reflect local character and preferences". A simpler assessment of the environmental impact and sustainability of proposals would be incorporated into the new system.
Planning law expert Richard Griffiths of Pinsent Masons said: "The paper provides a teaser as to how the government may reform the Strategical Environmental Assessment, Sustainability Appraisal and Environmental Impact Assessment processes".
"If the government presses ahead with the zone-based approach, then the current SEA/EIA regulations will not work and will need to be revised. With reference in the paper to the UK being outside the EU and to protections that make the 'biggest difference' to species, habitats and ecosystems, there will be real concern that the government will use these planning reforms to water down dramatically the current environmental protections. Whilst this may well speed up the planning process, speed cannot be at the expense of the environment," he said.